Low SES School Communities National Partnership: evaluation of staffing, management and accountability initiatives - results from 2012 principal survey, progress report 3
![2013-low-ses-management-and-accountability-initiatives-results-from-2012-report-3-thumbnail](/content/dam/main-education/about-us/educational-data/cese/evaluation-evidence-bank/thumbnails/2013-low-ses-management-and-accountability-initiatives-results-from-2012-report-3-thumbnail.jpg/jcr:content/renditions/cq5dam.web.1280.1280.jpeg)
![2013-low-ses-management-and-accountability-initiatives-results-from-2012-report-3-thumbnail](/content/dam/main-education/about-us/educational-data/cese/evaluation-evidence-bank/thumbnails/2013-low-ses-management-and-accountability-initiatives-results-from-2012-report-3-thumbnail.jpg/jcr:content/renditions/cq5dam.web.1280.1280.jpeg)
Information | |
---|---|
Authors | - |
Evaluator company | University of Melbourne |
Year | 2013 |
Classification | Other evidence |
Study type | Expert opinion |
Evaluation type | Both process and outcome |
Summary
The aim of this report was to identify the extent to which Staffing, Management and Accountability reforms had been implemented as part of the Low Socio-economic Status School Communities National Partnership and the perceived effectiveness of these reforms. The evaluators surveyed school principals from participating schools, with a response rate of 59 per cent across government and non-government schools. Most schools (97%) reported implementing at least one initiative from one of the five reform areas under investigation. A very high proportion of principals (97%) reported implementing reforms that provided innovative and tailored learning opportunities. While still high, principals were less likely to report implementing incentives to attract high performing teachers and principals (77%) and adopting best practice performance management and staffing arrangements (75%). Principals reported that the reforms were effective. The reforms that were less likely to be implemented were also viewed as the most effective initiatives to bring about school improvements.