Project proposals for various works on school sites
Direction and guidance on requesting and approving project proposals for any type of works on school sites. This does not include proactive, planned and reactive maintenance and callouts. This procedure supports staff using FMWeb 2.0.
Audience
All department staff that lodge, review and approve project proposals.
Version | Date | Description of changes | Approved by |
---|---|---|---|
V01.2.0 | 21/02/2025 | Updated to reflect the increase in principal delegation to commission works (from $10,000 to $50,000). | Executive Director, Asset Management |
V01.1.0 | 18/06/2024 | Clarification of asset-related works that can be facilitated by a school GA and P&C without seeking Asset Management approval, types of work that schools may undertake with written Asset Management approval from either a Senior Group Leader or Director and types of work that must only be undertaken or facilitated by Asset Management. | Executive Director, Asset Management |
V01.0.0 |
13/05/2024 |
Under the 2023 Policy and procedure review program, consolidated instructions previously provided in the Joint Funding of Capital Works in Schools policy and the School, Community or Joint Funded Capital or Asset Related Work procedure. This revised procedure:
|
Secretary, NSW Department of Education |
About the policy
This procedure supports the Asset management policy.
Term | Definition |
---|---|
ASO |
Asset Services Officer. They provide advice and support to schools and are the primary point of contact in the local School Infrastructure Regional Office for asset-related matters. |
EFSG |
Educational Facilities Standards and Guidelines. |
FMC |
Facilities maintenance contractors provide maintenance support to the department by responding to maintenance issues reported by schools. |
FMWeb 2.0 |
Online platform for department staff to manage call outs for reactive maintenance services and new project proposals for capital works on school sites. |
Project proposal |
Project proposals may be lodged for:
|
School Infrastructure |
The School Infrastructure division manages the department’s Asset Management Framework in compliance with the NSW Treasury Policy for asset management (TPP19-07). It is responsible for the Asset management policy and related procedures. |
Principals:
- are responsible for all project proposals
- as the site manager, must seek advice and approval from the local Asset Services Officer (ASO) or School Infrastructure Regional Office before any asset-related work, including planning, maintenance, repairs or projects, takes place on school sites
- adhere to instructions provided by their local ASO or School Infrastructure Regional Office about any works on school sites to ensure the safety and wellbeing of the school community
- work collaboratively with their local ASO to prepare and submit a project proposal via FMWeb 2.0
- support the department’s commitment to sustainability when considering projects on school sites
- may delegate project proposal administrative tasks to staff
- must endorse any school funded project proposals up to $150,000 (inclusive of GST) within their financial delegation responsibilities
- must seek approval from the Director, Educational Leadership or Executive Director to use 6100 funds for infrastructure projects or project proposals over $150,000 (inclusive of GST).
Principal’s delegate:
- must comply with this procedure when supporting the principal by undertaking delegated project proposal related tasks, as requested by the principal.
Asset Services Officers:
- provide advice and support to schools as the primary point of contact in the local School Infrastructure Regional Office for asset-related matters
- must ensure that any works on school sites are appropriately assessed and have received necessary approvals before any works are undertaken
- communicate clear instructions to school staff about any works on school sites to ensure the school community’s safety and wellbeing
- consult with principals on project proposal applications to determine the scope, budget estimates and school funds available for the project. Consider the overall merit of the project and other key elements
- assess project proposals submitted in FMWeb 2.0 in consultation with other School Infrastructure Regional Office representatives, and consider the Educational Facilities Standards and Guidelines (EFSG), project viability, the overall merit of the project, budget estimates and funds available to complete the project. Ensure hazardous materials are taken into consideration within the assessment review process
- seek advice to ensure that relevant planning approvals are obtained before works commence, and any proposed works are undertaken in compliance with relevant department policies, commitments, legislation and supporting guidelines such as statutory approval pathways
- participate in the approval workflow for project proposals.
School Infrastructure Regional Office:
- must ensure that appropriate consultation and approvals occur before any work begins on a school site
- assist Asset Services Officers to ensure clear instructions are provided to schools about any works on school sites, including consideration of factors such as the ESFG, project viability, the overall merit of the project, required external approvals, estimates and school funds available
- work with schools to establish the delivery method of a project and confirm School Infrastructure’s approval to proceed with a project
- obtain project quotes from local contractors within FMWeb 2.0 for school-funded reactive projects and manage projects adhering to the department’s procurement policies and guidelines
- project manage all approved works on school sites, in consultation with the principal
- support the project approvals process.
Asset Management finance team:
- process funding-related matters, including necessary transactions.
Senior Group Leaders, Asset Management:
- review proposal applications and advise the Asset Services Officers, if needed
- approve applications for projects up to $75,000 (incl. GST).
Directors, Educational Leadership:
- approve project proposals up to $500,000 (incl. GST).
Regional Office Director, Asset Management:
- approves applications for projects up to $500,000 (incl. GST).
Executive Director, Public Schools:
- approves project proposals over $500,000 (incl. GST).
What needs to be done
This procedure supports staff using FMWeb 2.0. It outlines the workflow for the project proposal section.
1. Determine which works require Asset Management approval
School Infrastructure Asset Management:
- must approve and manage most works on a school or department owned site, before any asset-related works begin. This is to ensure the safety and wellbeing of the school community
- will support principals by ensuring any works comply with relevant department policies, commitments, legislation and supporting guidelines.
1.1 Work that does not require Asset Management approval
School general assistants (GA) can conduct asset maintenance activities based on their role description, with the support of the school principal. These works do not need Asset Management approval if due diligence is conducted by checking the following:
- The room or building does not have heritage status by checking the NSW Government’s Environment and Heritage listing.
- The area that the work will be undertaken does not have any known or suspected asbestos-containing material as per the school’s Asbestos Register or Site Specific Asbestos Management Plan.
- Compliance with the department’s Work health and safety policy.
Types of asset maintenance work that a GA can do:
- preparation and maintenance of equipment
- minor maintenance of building, plant and equipment subject to meeting asset management requirements above, for example
- repainting walls
- installing shelves, hooks, pin boards and other supporting materials on walls
- maintaining school playing fields, gardens and lawns.
If unsure, please contact your Asset Services Officer to seek clarification.
1.2 Work that schools may undertake with Asset Management approval
Asset-related works in schools must be submitted through FMWeb 2.0 and approved by an Asset Management Senior Group Leader or Director.
Example of works that may be approved by Asset Management for delivery by school staff or via FMC, include:
- low-risk works under $50,000
- installing non-illuminated signs up to 2.0 metres from the floor or ground
- landscaping work except where the site has an Asbestos in Grounds Management Plan or a long-term Environmental Management Plan
- replacement of interactive screens
- replacement of existing food tech and TAS equipment, provided no significant re-wiring is involved and no alterations to exhaust systems
- minor installations of play equipment that do not require soft fall certification.
Local contractors not registered to the Facilities Maintenance Contract will need to:
- meet the relevant accreditation and working with children check requirements
- adhere to the conflict of interest policies.
1.3 Work that Asset Management will deliver
This includes:
- high voltage or 3-phase electrical work
- work at heights, the work face over 3.0 metres from the floor or the ground
- works in areas where the asbestos register shows asbestos or the potential for asbestos or other hazardous materials
- high risk work, which is any of the above, and also anything involving heavy equipment, for example, excavation work
- works on heritage assets or sites
- structural modifications to buildings, including but not limited to, the removal and/or installation of
- walls (including operable walls)
- doors
- windows
- stairs
- balustrades
- mezzanines
- works requiring complex management of multiple trades
- work involving a person working in or near a shaft or trench with an excavated depth greater than 1.5 metres.
The Asset Management Regional Director will need to discuss any works not covered by the above list with the Executive Director, Asset Management.
If the proposed project exceeds current Educational Facilities Standards and Guidelines (EFSG) requirements, the school or other contributors may be required to pay for ongoing running and maintenance costs.
To log maintenance and repair callouts, or raise asset-related queries, refer to the Maintenance and callout procedures.
2. Submit the proposal for works on school sites
Asset Services Officers (ASO) are available to support schools during the project proposal process. However, principals do not have to contact an ASO before they submit a proposal.
For project proposals for joint and department funded works to be considered in the same year’s budget cycle, principals must submit the proposal before the end of Term 1 each year. Project proposals submitted after Term 1 can be considered in the next year’s budget cycle. Projects will be assessed against the needs of all schools across the state and prioritised accordingly.
On receipt of a request in FMWeb 2.0 for approval for works that can be undertaken by a school the Asset Management Unit will review:
- the works type
- the location of the proposed work
- hazardous materials or contamination
- heritage status and safety implications of the works.
Principals (or delegates) must follow this guide to submit a proposal in FMWeb 2.0:
- Log into FMWeb 2.0. Go to ‘Project Proposal’ and click ‘Add New’. Details on the left of the screen will be prepopulated with the principal’s name and school email.
- Select the date and time of submission. The proposal status will be automatically set to ‘Logged’.
- Follow the prompts to add a description of the proposed works and any supporting documentation.
- Click ‘Save and exit’ to submit the proposal. The local ASO will be notified by email to review.
- Contact the ASO for any questions about the proposal. The local ASO’s details for each school can be seen at the top of every page in FMWeb 2.0.
3. Assess the proposal
The Asset Services Officer (ASO) will assess the proposal:
1. Review project proposal details in FMWeb 2.0.
2. Contact the principal (or their delegate) after reviewing the proposal to advise it has been received and is being actioned.
3. Discuss the next steps with the Senior Group Leader, Asset Management, to determine the best approach for the school and the project. This involves determining whether a site visit to the school is required to assess the proposal’s viability; checking for any requirements such as planning approvals and supporting environmental assessments; understanding the funding program; and estimating costs based on comparable projects. For any queries, the ASO will contact the principal.
4. The ASO will review and add details to the project proposal within FMWeb 2.0 by including details of the scope of work, assessment information and a concept estimate of the project costs. The proposal will be returned to the principal for financial endorsement when this review is complete.
4. Review and endorse the proposal
Following the principal’s financial endorsement, the project will return to the Asset Service Officer (ASO) to submit the project proposal for review and approval by the Asset Management Group Leader and Asset Management Senior Group Leader or Director. If not approved to proceed within the current financial year, the works will remain within the project proposals platform for consideration as part of the department’s program of prioritising school-funded works projects.
Financial delegation:
- Principals endorse proposals up to $150,000 (incl. GST).
- Directors, Educational Leadership endorse proposals up to $500,000 (incl. GST).
- Executive Directors, Public Schools endorse proposals over $500,000 (incl. GST).
Principals:
1. review the project proposal within FMWeb 2.0, including the ASO’s project assessment and an expected cost guide. Prices are not sourced at this stage
2. can endorse the application within FMWeb 2.0 by selecting the ‘approved’ or ‘not approved’ radio button and selecting ‘save’. The application will then return to the ASO to continue with the approval process. Note: the principal endorsement is confirming that the agreed estimated funds are set aside in the school budget to be journalled by the Asset Management Unit to fund the project. Should further funds be required for this project, the ASO will discuss this before commencing the project.
5. Approve the project
If approved by the Senior Group Leader or Asset Management Director, the principal will receive notification to advise that either:
- the school can self-deliver the project, if the application requests this option
- works will be delivered via FMWeb 2.0 by a local contractor already onboarded within the system
- works will be delivered and managed via the regional Asset Management team.
Financial delegation:
- Senior Group Leaders approve projects up to $75,000 (incl. GST).
- School Infrastructure Regional Office Directors approve projects up to $500,000 (incl. GST).
- Executive Director, Asset Management approves projects up to $2 million (incl. GST).
The Asset Services Officer (ASO) manages the approval process as follows:
1. After receiving the project proposal within FMWeb 2.0 from the principal, the ASO begins the project review.
2. A thorough review from the ASO and approval from Group Leaders or Senior Group Leaders is required for all project proposals. For projects costs estimated higher than $75,000 (incl. GST), refer to the financial delegation section to determine who is responsible for approving those projects. Project proposals can be viewed to see where a project is pending action for approval.
3. The ASO will review the proposal’s outcome, and:
- if approved, the ASO will advise it is approved and provide guidance on the next steps.
- if not approved, the project proposal will be noted as ‘Assessment not approved’. This can be seen within FMWeb 2.0 and the ASO should provide the reason.
6. Deliver the project
1. Once the Asset Services Officer (ASO) has all required approvals, School Infrastructure Regional Office will progress to the next steps depending on the type of project (school or community funded, joint department funded or department funded) as outlined below.
2. The School Infrastructure Regional Office will provide instructions and support to the school during works on school sites.
Principals must disclose any perceived or known operational health and safety risks to the ASO as soon as possible.
After the school has confirmed their committed funding and the project is approved to proceed within the project proposal platform in FMWeb 2.0, Asset Management will complete and confirm a funds transfer (journal entry).
The Asset Services Officer will request the principal to sign off the proposal in FMWeb 2.0. It will then progress to the Asset Management finance team to process.
Once the funds are confirmed via the annual state budget and the school has confirmed the committed funding from the school budget, the Regional Office Director, Asset Management will activate the nomination as a ‘Project for delivery’. Only the director has the authority to do this. The proposal becomes a formalised project managed through the School Infrastructure Regional Office.
Once the funds are confirmed via the annual state budget, the Regional Office Director, Asset Management will activate the nomination as a ‘Project for delivery’. Only the director has the authority to do this. The proposal becomes a formalised project managed through the School Infrastructure Regional Office.
Record-keeping requirements
Principals must retain all documentation until it is uploaded in digital versions to FMWeb 2.0.
Refer to Functional Retention and Disposal Authority: FA387 for information on retaining and disposing of records.
Mandatory tools and templates
- MyPL module, Control and Management of Asbestos in NSW Public Schools, available from Mandatory training.
Supporting tools, resources and related information
Policy contact
Local Asset Services Officer, Asset Management, School Infrastructure
Contact details are at the top of the FMWeb 2.0 webpage after logging in
School Infrastructure FMC call centre
1300 009 344
fmweb2.helpdesk@det.nsw.edu.au
The Executive Director, Asset Management monitors the implementation of this procedure, regularly reviews its contents to ensure relevance and accuracy, and updates it as needed.