Bulletin 19 - Liability and rights of staff in relation to serious incidents which involve potential risk of injury to persons on departmental premises
Legal Issues Bulletin 19 - Staff rights and responsibilities after a serious incident
Legal Issues Bulletin 19 - Staff rights and responsibilities after a serious incident
Please wait while page index is generated
The procedures for dealing with serious incidents in schools premises are governed by the Incident Reporting Policy and associated Incident Reporting Procedures (PDF 215.44KB) documents. The policy and procedures provide a comprehensive regime that outlines a number of strategies to be implemented for a variety of serious incidents that may occur in schools premises.
These documents are supplemented by a range of other policy documents that provide staff with guidelines on how to deal with a number of related issues - for example the Suspension and Expulsion of School Students Procedures (PDF 1734.18KB) and the Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) Risk Management Policy and associated documents.
Sometimes an incident that occurs at a school may need to be reported to the Safety and Security directorate and or the police. Information about when an incident should be reported can be found in Memorandum to principals DN/10/00225 - reporting incidents involving Assaults, Threats, Intimidation or Harassment.
This range of policy documents supports the department in meeting its duty of care towards students, staff and visitors who attend department sites and activities on a daily basis. The duty of care towards these people arises from two sources - the common law and legislation.
Common law is law not contained in legislation but determined by precedents set by courts. The department has a responsibility under common law to ensure that reasonable steps are taken to protect students from not insignificant risks that are reasonably foreseeable. This duty extends to taking reasonable care to prevent students from injuring themselves, injuring others or damaging property. While the duty is not to provide an absolute guarantee of safety, it does require that reasonable steps be taken to protect students. A foreseeable risk is one that is not "far-fetched or fanciful". The duty of care towards students is one that rests ultimately with the department.
Unless acting with serious and wilful misconduct, staff are not personally liable in respect of injuries sustained by students. In practical terms, however, the department's compliance with its duty of care is assessed on the basis of the actions and omissions of its staff. The department's liability for the actions of its employees is called vicarious liability. This long established common law principle is reinforced by the Civil Liability Act. This Act requires employers to indemnify staff in relation to their negligent acts or omissions. The employee's right to an indemnity does not apply if the negligent act or omission arises from the serious and willful misconduct of the employee.
To meet the department's duty of care, principals need to be able to demonstrate that systems are in place to identify risks and that once identified, precautions are taken to avoid or minimise those risks. The duty means that staff cannot ignore potential hazards and are required to take firm, positive action to safeguard students from those hazards.
In matters involving violence, threatened violence (e.g. assaults, threats of assault, school invasions) and other identified risks to the safety of students, action that can be taken by staff may, depending on the circumstances, be limited.
Nevertheless, the duty of care owed to students will generally not be met if no action at all is taken. It has been a long-held legal principle that staff have an obligation to take some action to prevent the risk of injury arising from fights involving students. Similar obligations would arise if staff are aware of students dealing in drugs or possessing illegal drugs on departmental premises.
While members of staff should not place themselves at risk of physical harm, a number of basic strategies are available including:
What action should or can be taken by staff will depend on the particular circumstances of the situation including the age and size of the persons involved, age and size of the staff, number of persons involved, number of staff, location and whether weapons or other dangerous implements are being used.
In assessing whether the department has met its duty of care to students who are injured on departmental premises, courts have historically imposed a very high standard on school staff. The standard expected is one that requires positive action to be taken.
Provided staff act without any serious and willful misconduct, they will be entitled to be indemnified by the department in respect of any personal injury claim that might arise if the duty of care is not met. At the same time the department requires all staff to act in accordance with its policies which are designed to implement the department's duty of care.
Staff should be aware that in any personal injury claims arising from serious incidents, in the absence of serious and willful misconduct on the part of a member of staff, the department will be liable for any action - not the staff member. The department will also vigorously defend any action arising where appropriate strategies are in place and staff have acted in accordance with their obligations and departmental policy.
If staff determine that physical intervention is an appropriate response to a particular situation, then any force used in that intervention must be reasonable having regard to the circumstances and any force used must be proportional to the nature of the threat. Reasonable force in dealing with a young infant or primary school student will be significantly different from that in dealing with a senior secondary school student.
Staff who use physical intervention to diffuse dangerous situations are occasionally subject to complaint. The department's actions in respect of such complaints are monitored by the Ombudsman. If staff encounter situations where they use physical intervention to meet their duty of care, they should be confident that provided the intervention is reasonable and proportionate, no adverse action will result.
It is also possible that staff who use physical intervention may be subject to criminal assault proceedings by the police or by private prosecution. If this does occur, the staff member can apply to the department for Crown representation. That means the Government will provide defence lawyers to assist the staff member if the staff member was acting in accordance with their duty. It should be noted that such criminal proceedings are extremely rare. Given the defences available to staff, the probability of a staff member who has acted professionally and reasonably being convicted is virtually nil.
The department has an obligation under the provisions of the Work Health & Safety Act 2011 to ensure the health, safety and welfare at work of all its workers. This duty includes an obligation to:
In addition to its obligations to workers, the department is also obliged to ensure that people other than workers (e.g. students and visitors) are not exposed to risks to their health or safety arising from the department's activities while they are at departmental work sites.
While at work, workers are obliged to take reasonable care for the health and safety of people who are at the worksite and who may be affected by the employee's acts or omissions at work. Workers are also obliged to co-operate with the department as far as is necessary to enable the department to comply with its obligations under the Act.
The obligations imposed on the department by the legislation are theoretically more stringent than those imposed by the common law. The statutory obligations in relation to other workers are, however, generally similar to those applying under the common law - i.e. reasonable care is to be taken for the health and safety of persons at the worksite.
In practical terms, however, the obligations imposed on the department and those in charge of worksites by the legislation equate to the standard traditionally applied by the courts in relation to the department's common law duty of care.
As well as having obligations imposed by both the common law and legislation, it can equally be said that staff have a number of rights.
Principals have the right to:
Other workers have the right to:
The implementation of any or all of the strategies outlined needs to be in accordance with any relevant policy requirements that apply. Principals should also familiarise themselves with the provisions of the following Legal Issues Bulletins: