School libraries matter!

The missing piece in the education puzzle.

Holly Godfree, teacher librarian at Lake Tuggeranong College in the ACT, and Olivia Neilson, teacher librarian at Lyneham Primary School in the ACT, examine the skills students will need for the future and how school library staff and services support these skills.

For some time now, there has been rising concern about the steady decline in the performance of Australian students in international testing such as the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) and the stagnation or decline in various aspects of our National Assessment Program. At the same time, staffing levels of qualified teacher librarians (TLs) are dropping. The results of an ongoing study into library staffing levels in Australian Capital Territory (ACT) schools are shared and discussed. Future implications for the library profession are identified.

Introduction

There is widespread dismay (Hardy, 2016; Karp, 2016; Riddle & Lingard, 2016; Bickers, 2017; Singhal, 2017) about Australia’s declining results in reading, science and mathematics in comparison to students from other OECD countries (Programme for International Student Achievement [PISA], 2015; Thomson, De Bortoli & Underwood, 2017). Simultaneously, national tests have shown a 13% decline since 2011 in the number of Year 10 students reaching a proficient standard in information and communication technology (ICT) literacy (Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority [ACARA], 2015). These students perform well when given instructions for how to complete a task, but are weak in researching (finding, analysing and synthesising) digital information for a specific purpose. Furthermore, internationally, 89% of Year 8 students ‘feel confident to find information on the internet’, but only 2% of them actually use critical thinking when searching online (International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement, n.d.). This disparity between self-assessment and actual application of skills is even greater in Australia, where 94% feel confident to find information on the internet while only 4% use critical thinking when searching online (Fraillon et al., 2014, p. 157).

Groups like the Foundation for Young Australians (FYA) (2016; 2017) and the New Media Consortium (NMC) (2017) offer evidence-based predictions outlining the skills young people will need to succeed and the educational trends needed to support them. Skills like problem solving, multi-disciplinary learning, critical thinking, and the need to use technology well (not just to use technology) feature prominently in these projections. An essential component to reversing these trends, solving many of these problems and preparing today’s young people for their futures is the reinvigoration of school libraries.

School libraries: the missing piece of the puzzle

Abundant data show the positive impact qualified teacher librarians (TLs) have on literacy outcomes (Todd & Kuhlthau, 2005a; Todd & Kuhlthau, 2005b; Francis, Lance & Lietzau, 2010; Kachel, 2011; Hughes et al., 2013; Scholastic Library Publishing, 2016; Softlink, 2015; Softlink, 2016; Softlink, 2017). This impact is significant and independent of socio-economic status (Lance & Hofschire, 2012; Pennsylvania School Library Project, 2012; Scholastic Library Publishing, 2016, p. 9). TLs also specialise in differentiated, inquiry learning, which is a strong focus in the Australian Curriculum (Lupton, 2013; Nayler, 2014; ACARA, 2018) and the Early Years Learning Framework (Australian Government Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations, 2009).

TLs help students and teachers improve their digital literacy skills, which, contrary to stubborn, popular belief, do not come ‘naturally’ to anyone (Kirschner & De Bruyckere, 2017). We are naive if we expect students to become information and digitally literate without a comprehensive program of learning (Fraillon et al., 2014, pp. 24–25). School library services provide tailored resources and skills-based lessons for each particular community, saving time, filling ‘gaps’ and reducing workload for classroom teachers who are then able to spend that extra time and energy planning better lessons.

Australian school libraries’ staffing and resources have been in decline for many years now, particularly in primary schools (Tarica, 2010; Hay, 2013; Mitchell & Weldon, 2016; Softlink, 2015; Softlink, 2016; Softlink, 2017). This decline raised such alarm that there was a senate inquiry held in 2010-2011 to investigate school libraries and TLs (House of Representatives Standing Committee on Education and Employment, 2011). The inquiry concurred with the International Federation of Library Associations (IFLA) in recognising that it is ‘essential to have a well-trained and highly motivated staff’ (IFLA, 2015, p. 25) and, among their 11 recommendations, highlighted the need to identify staffing levels of qualified staff and to conduct a workforce gap analysis.

Anyone working in a school library would likely be familiar with feelings of frustration when reading reports of these international studies highlighting the importance of students having skills such as evaluating the relevance and credibility of digital information and accessing information efficiency (such as Fraillon et al., 2014). We know that school library staff teach exactly these things (and more). Yet, inexplicably, school libraries are rarely mentioned in these articles and, in too many schools, continue to suffer from cuts to staffing and resources.

Skills for the future

Various skills and trends have been identified as necessary for young people in an increasingly automated and globalised world (Tables 1 and 2). Consider how these skills are addressed by school library staff and services.

Skills for the future

How school library staff and services address these skills

Problem solving

Solving problems is inherent in all aspects of the research process. e.g. Where do I find the answer to my question?

Critical thinking and judgement

Critically evaluating websites.
Taking and making notes.
Synthesising information.

Learning on the job

Knowing how to learn e.g. developing questions, pulling out the most relevant facts from the best sources, strategies for what to do when stuck.
Seeking and identifying the best information.

Working with people

Collaborating on inquiry projects.
Maximising opportunities offered through rich literature. e.g. ‘walking’ in another’s shoes, seeing different perspectives

Getting the most out of technology

Employing smart search strategies.
Using databases efficiently.
Applying knowledge of intellectual property laws.
Creating content to contribute to the wider community.
Online safety and digital security.

Project and time management

Planning and managing personalised and group research projects.
Understanding the stages of the information and digital literacy processes.

Table 1: Skills required in the future workforce (Foundation for Young Australians, 2017a, 2017b) and how they are provided by school libraries

Projected trend

Role of school library staff and services

Teachers needing to become facilitators of self-directed learning

TLs do this by helping students and teachers when they are stuck and supporting them to continue to the next stage of their projects.

Creating more inter- and multidisciplinary learning opportunities

TLs do this by collaborating with teachers and students from all curriculum areas.
The ‘process’ skills TLs teach are applicable to all disciplines.
TLs have a ‘bird’s eye view’ of the school.

Long-term trend: Deeper, more authentic learning

TLs are trained to support inquiry models which are personalised for students (e.g. Guided inquiry and project-based learning).
The best practice for TLs is working within a flexible timetable to team teach just-in-time lessons for specific skills.

Theme of educational change: Technology alone is not enough to mitigate various issues of potential disadvantage

TLs do this differentiation by catering to each individual person and each specific learning community as the core business of the school library.

Theme of educational change: Improving digital literacy

TLs know that being digitally ‘fluent’ is much more than just knowing how to use ICTs.
Teachers learn ICT skills from watching other teachers (Fraillon et al., 2014).

Table 2: Projected trends for K–12 education identified by the Horizon Report (NMC, 2017) and how they can be met by school libraries.

There is an extremely high overlap of the lists of skills young people will need and the skills which qualified TLs teach. The problem is that this potential match is not realised because increasing numbers of school libraries are being run by unqualified staff, who cannot teach these skills because they are not teachers and/ or are not qualified librarians. Even though many of these are passionate people who care deeply about the library and the students, without the relevant training, the full range of library services cannot be offered, and there all-too-frequently develops ‘an atmosphere where libraries are perceived to have no intrinsic value’ (Johnson, 2007, p. 132) and become even more vulnerable to cuts.

While many individuals have personally witnessed the decline in library staffing through lower attendance at conferences and professional learning events, national data show a substantial decrease in recent years. A comparison of data from the annual Softlink school library surveys for the past four years (Hay, 2013; Softlink, 2015; Softlink, 2016; Softlink, 2017) shows an overall drop in library staffing for 17% of Australian schools in 2013, 19% in 2014 and 12% in 2015. The 2016 data show an overall increase of 6%. However, even if this positive trend were to continue, given the substantial drop in previous years it would take some time to reach staffing levels equivalent to five years ago.

School library staffing data: Australian Capital Territory (ACT)

In the past six years we have conducted a series of staffing surveys about school libraries in Canberra. Each survey has been slightly different, and so we will briefly summarise the scope of each (Table 3) before sharing highlights of the results.

Year

Scope

Response rate

2012

All government schools in ACT (P–12)

59%

2013

Australian Education Union members, ACT branch

16%
(487 members)

2014

All government schools in ACT (P–12)

67%

2016

All government schools in ACT (P–12)

83%

2017

All ACT primary schools (government, Catholic, independent)

Government = 84%
Catholic = 52% Independent = 87%

Table 3: Overview of library staffing surveys in ACT.

Terminology

For the purpose of these surveys, the following definitions have been used:

  • Teacher librarian: a person who has completed OR is currently in the process of completing a specialist qualification in this area (for example, dual qualifications in education and librarianship).
  • Early childhood school: with students from preschool to Year 2
  • Primary school: with students from preschool to Year 6 (the 2017 survey was ‘with some or all students from preschool to Year 6’)
  • P–10: with students from preschool to Year 10
  • High school: with students from Year 7 to Year 10
  • College: with students from Year 11 to Year 12

Online surveys were conducted each year. With the exception of 2013, all surveys were distributed via our local email listserv for school library staff in the ACT (and surrounds) and then individual follow-up was attempted for any schools who had not responded. In 2013, the AEU ACT office distributed the survey to all members.

Library staffing across age groups

These data (Figure 1) confirm anecdotal evidence in showing a decline in qualified TLs in government schools up to Year 10. Of high concern is that, despite the common knowledge that early intervention is a vitally important way to address inequity and raise student learning outcomes, students and teachers in P–6 schools are the most severely understaffed.

Staffing levels ACT

Figure 1.

Library staffing across sectors

Data from 2017 (Figure 2) highlight the difference between library staffing levels in independent, Catholic and government schools. On average, independent schools have one full-time TL and one full-time library support staff member. In contrast, Catholic schools have one half-time TL and one half-time support staff member and government schools have a TL for 1.5 days a week and a library support staff member for three days a week. Over half of Catholic and government school students and teachers had no TL at all.Teacher librarian and support staff

Figure 2.

Importance of library staffing team

‘The richness and quality of a school library program primarily depends upon the human resources available within and beyond a school library’ (IFLA 2015, p. 25). While it is simple (and important) to talk about qualified TLs, the importance of qualified library support staff must be emphasised. The best school libraries have a combination of physical and digital resources in their collection and, consequently, there are a range of physical and digital tasks involved in providing high-quality library services. Care and maintenance of technology and the physical collection are vitally important, but can sometimes be misunderstood to be the only things required in a library. A school library with only a TL will hobble what the TL can do because s/he will have to manage the physical collection as a necessary, practical priority. In contrast, a school library run by a school assistant will likely be tidy; however, fewer digital resources will be in the collection, no information or digital literacy skills will be taught and no collaborative teaching and planning will happen. To reach their full potential, school libraries must have a team of qualified staff.

Each school makes decisions

Staffing level data from 2017 (Table 4) show that library staffing varies across sectors but also across schools within sectors. In Canberra, both government and Catholic schools typically have lower library staffing levels than independent schools, with Catholic schools having a slightly higher proportion of TLs. Two limitations of the 2017 survey are that we do not know the number of students at each school and that it is highly likely that the schools who did not reply did not have any TLs. If so, the percentages of TLs in all sectors could be lower than the survey indicated.

Sector

Percentage of schools with a TL

Highest staffing level of TLs

Lowest staffing level of TLs

Highest staffing level of all library staff*

Lowest staffing level of all library staff*

Independent

77%

3.1

0

6.7

0

Catholic

53%

1.0

0

1.7

0.5

Government

40%

1.0

0

2.8

0

* ‘All library staff’ refers to any paid staff regularly working in the library (including TLs).
Table 4: Staffing levels of teacher librarians and all library staff in 2017.

As Table 4 shows, there are well-staffed and under-staffed libraries in individual independent, Catholic and government schools because the decision about school library staffing is vested in each individual school community. Importantly, Figure 3 shows that principals have a high level of appreciation of the skills and expertise of TLs. Despite this, library staffing levels continue to fall in government schools except colleges (Figure 1).

Level of interest working with TL

Figure 3.

Collectively, many years of data show a decline in qualified TLs in many schools in the ACT at the same time that student learning outcomes in the three Rs and in digital literacy have also declined for all Australian students. The early years of education and the government and Catholic sectors appear to be the hardest hit by library staffing cuts. Many principals are very interested in having a TL work with their students, but the decline has continued. We find ourselves in the very bleak situation where large numbers of students, teachers and communities have been operating with low-level library services for so long that they may not even realise what they are missing out on.

School Libraries Matter!

There is a growing movement of interested individuals and organisations working towards a shared goal: that all students in Australia have equitable access to quality school library services delivered by qualified school library staff. The School Library Coalition, which comprises the Australian Library and Information Association (ALIA), Australian School Library Association (ASLA), School Library Association of New South Wales (SLANSW), School Library Association of South Australia (SLASA), School Library Association of Victoria (SLAV), Queensland School Library Association (QSLA), and Western Australian School Library Association (WASLA), is leading this effort with their advocacy group coordinating the national School Libraries Matter! campaign, to be launched this year.

Around the world, there are other visionary groups working to reinvigorate their school libraries to address the needs of their students (Digital Promise, 2014; Flood, 2017). Some efforts have been made in Australia to target principals and politicians (Godfree & Neilson, 2014), but the Students Need School Libraries campaign will target parents in the hope that they will become empowered to ask informed questions and apply pressure to improve school libraries in their local communities.

What can you do?

  • Join and support the Students Need School Libraries campaign
  • Check out and promote the Students Need School Libraries website
  • Read the blog post – To supercharge student success: start with a great school library
  • Like and follow the Students Need School Libraries campaign Facebook or Twitter, and:
    • Personally Invite your friends to like and follow. People are more likely to accept If you send them a direct Invite or message rather than just sharing.
    • Ask your friends to Invite their friends. The aim Is go get the #StudentsNeedSchoolLibraries to trend on the evening of the 16th October. This will only happen If there are lots of people sharing/posting/tweeting at the same time.
  • If you are a teacher librarian, hold information/digital literacy sessions for teachers and parents.
  • This is a concrete demonstration of your skills and usefulness. Consider offering these at a school which does not have a qualified teacher librarian.
  • A few (of many) topics that might generate high interest include: Smart searching online, website evaluation, creating a positive digital footprint.
  • Gather library staffing data in your area. Ideally, teacher librarian and support staff data will be collected from each state/territory. But even if it’s only in your district, something is better than nothing. We are happy to be contacted to share questions we’ve used in our surveys.

It’s time

There was a surge in public support for school libraries after Sara Fenwick’s 1966 report into school and children’s libraries in Australia which ushered in a golden age for library services for young people (Johnson, 2007). Globally, nationally and locally, the elements are present for a new outpouring of informed interest by the public today. As library professionals, it is our job to spark and light that fire.

Acknowledgements

We would like to gratefully acknowledge the help of Dr Robert Godfree for assistance with data analysis and reviewing the manuscript, the AEU ACT office and members for ongoing encouragement and support, our wonderful school library community in Canberra who have taken the time to answer all these surveys, and our families for their patience and support with our professional passions.

References

Australian Curriculum and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2018). Australian curriculum

Australian Curriculum and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2015). National Assessment Program — ICT Literacy. Years 6 & 10: Report 2014.

Australian Government Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR). (2009). Belonging, being & becoming: The early years learning framework for Australia – information for families.

Bickers, C. (2017). Australian students on par with Singapore’s most disadvantaged, PISA test guru warns. News Corp Australia Network.

Digital Promise. (2014). The new librarian: Leaders in the digital age. Digital Promise: Accelerating Innovation in Education.

Fenwick, S. (1966). School and children’s libraries in Australia: a report to the children’s libraries section of the Library Association of Australia. Melbourne: Cheshire.

Flood, A. (2017). Neil Gaiman leads authors demanding action to halt decline of school libraries. The Guardian.

Foundation for Young Australians (FYA). (2016). The new work mindset: 7 new job clusters to help young people navigate the new world order. Sydney: Foundation for Young Australians.

Foundation for Young Australians (FYA). (2017). The new work smarts: Thriving in the new work order. Sydney: Foundation for Young Australians.

Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Friedman, T. & Gebhardt, E. (2014). Preparing for life in a digital age: The IEA International Computer and Information Literacy Study International Report.

Francis, H. B., Lance, C. K. & Lietzau, Z. (2010). School librarians continue to help students achieve standards: The third Colorado study (2010).

Godfree, H. & Neilson, O. (2014). We are the weather makers. ACCESS, 28(2), 14-23.

Hardy, K. (2016). PISA results show further decline in Australia’s education rankings. The Canberra Times.

Hay, L. (2013). Australian school library survey report by Softlink. Students Learn Through School Libraries.

House of Representatives Standing Committee on Education and Employment. (2011). School libraries and teacher librarians in 21st century Australia. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

Hughes, H., Leigh, T., Osborne, M., Fraser, S., Kahl, C. & Reynolds, H. (2013). School libraries, teacher-librarians and literacy at Gold Coast schools: Research findings. Synergy, 11(2).

International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). (n.d.) Students in the digital age — current state of play: Assessing students’ computer and information literacy skills.

International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA). (2015). School library guidelines (2nd ed.).

Johnson, V. (2007). Life after Fenwick: the rise, fall and future of library services for children in Australia. Adelaide: Auslib Press.

Kachel, D. E. (2011). School library research summarized: A graduate class project. Mansfield University.

Karp, P. (2016). Pisa results: Australian students’ science, maths and reading in long-term decline. The Guardian.

Kirshner, P. & De Bruyckere, P. (2017). The myths of the digital native and the multitasker. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.001

Lance, K. C. & Hofschire, L. (2012). Change in school librarian staffing linked with change in CSAP reading performance, 2005 to 2011.

Lupton, M. (2013). Inquiry pedagogy and the Australian Curriculum. Primary and Middle Years Educator, 11(2), 23-29.

Mitchell, P. & Weldon, P. (2016). The school library workforce in Australia. Paper presented at the Australian Library and Information Association, ALIA National 2016 Conference, Adelaide.

Nayler, J. (2014). Enacting Australian Curriculum: Making connections for quality learning.

New Media Consortium (NMC). (2017). NMC/CoSN Horizon Report > 2017 K–12 Edition.

Pennsylvania School Library Project (Pennsylvania School Librarians Association, Health Sciences Library Consortium and Education Law Center of Pennsylvania). (2012). Creating 21st-century learners: A report on Pennsylvania’s public school libraries.

Programme for International Student Assessment. (2015). Compare your country.

Riddle, S. & Lingard, B. (2016). PISA results don’t look good, but what can we learn from the latest test? ABC News.

Scholastic Library Publishing. (2016). School libraries work! A compendium of research supporting the effectiveness of school libraries (2016 edition).

Singhal, P. (2017). Australia’s ‘tolerance of failure’ behind declining PISA results, says test coordinator. Sydney Morning Herald.

Softlink. (2015). The 2014 Softlink Australian and New Zealand school library survey.

Softlink. (2016). The 2015 Softlink Australian and New Zealand school library survey.

Softlink. (2017). The 2016 Softlink Australian and New Zealand school library survey.

Tarica, E. (2010). Library specialists being shelved. Sydney Morning Herald.

Thomson, S., De Bortoli, L. & Underwood, C. (2017). PISA 2015: Reporting Australia’s results.

Todd, R. J. & Kuhlthau, C. C. (2005a). Student learning through Ohio school libraries, Part 1: How effective school libraries help students.

Todd, R. J. & Kuhlthau, C. C. (2005b). Student learning through Ohio school libraries, Part 2: Faculty perceptions of effective school libraries. School Libraries Worldwide, 11(1), 89–110.

Article reprinted with permission from the Australian School Library Association (ASLA). Originally published In ACCESS Volume 32, Issue 1, March 2018.

How to cite this article – Godfree, H. & Neilson, O. (2018). School libraries matter! The missing piece in the puzzle. Scan 37(9). (Reprinted from ACCESS, 32(1), March 2018).

Return to top of page